2 Comments

Here is where this is going: www.gov.uk/government/news/new-measures-to-help-protect-poultry-industry-from-bird-flu

Under the changes announced there will be new requirements for all bird keepers - regardless of the size of their flock - to officially register their birds. Currently only those who keep 50 or more poultry must do so, limiting the effectiveness of our national disease control measures.

It is nonsense. The intent is to control the food supply.

The foundation appears to be being laid for another “pandemic” psy op (“avian flu”). See Dr William Makis substack.com/home/post/p-145899883

Re: restrictive land use bylaws, see ‘Recent events in Thorhild County inspire an apparent groundswell of opposition to rural municipalities’ planning reviews’ (Feb 9 2023) (quoted at end). www.producer.com/news/debate-over-land-use-planning-heats-up-in-alta/

Obviously urban areas require more attention to managing some things. However, the local population clearly wants this. The extent of silly rules proposed is reminiscent of the infamous “no singing in short-term rentals” rule. Not to mention the fees.

Note the references to bylaws of other municipalities in the Staff Report of July 9. Patronizing (and largely misleading) “safety” verbiage (once again) provides cover for hidden agendas from above.

They will come for the rural zone next.

Please see: kiclei.substack.com/p/reclaiming-local-sovereignty

re: pushback against (bogus) international agendas.

___________________

From (Alberta): Recent events in Thorhild County inspire an apparent groundswell of opposition to rural municipalities’ planning reviews (Feb 9 2023) www.producer.com/news/debate-over-land-use-planning-heats-up-in-alta/

What was written on the topic of fences in the Thorhild County draft land-use bylaw left little open for interpretation: “Agricultural District: razor or barbed wire shall not be permitted without a development permit.”

Other issues covered in the draft bylaw such as deck placement and regulations governing hens were also irksome to residents, who held a meeting to organize a campaign against the draft bylaw, attracting nearly 200 residents. ... ...

But in the face of the growing opposition, Thorhild County council held a special meeting on Feb. 2 to rescind the draft bylaw.

However, the issues surrounding land-use bylaws in rural parts of the province appear far from over as an apparent groundswell of support garnered by the actions of Thorhild County residents has sparked interest across Alberta.

“People are frustrated because they are losing control over their own decision making on their land and also, some other counties have posted some really stringent bylaws,” said Mitchell.

Opposition to what was happening in Thorhild has also connected municipal land- use planning to federal initiatives such as Smart Cities, which the government bills as, “empowering communities to address the most pressing needs of their residents through data and connected technology.”

It has also attracted detractors who link changes to municipal land-use bylaws to goals and objectives espoused by organizations such as the World Economic Forum (WEF).

Expand full comment

They wanna tax us for chickens , and tell us to fence the yard it cost about 3,000 dollars to get a survey for your property on top of the money to pay for the fencing on top of the Tax for the chickens, what money are residents saving at this point you don’t pay the taxes we do so until you start paying our taxes we don’t owe you anything for our chickens point blank period sounds like a dictatorship 🙄

Expand full comment